BOCCACCIO, THE DECAMERON, INTRODUCTION
The onset of the Black Death was described by Giovanni Boccaccio (1313-1375).
I say, then, that the years of the beatific incarnation of the Son of God had reached the tale of one thousand three hundred and forty eight, when in the illustrious city of Florence, the fairest of all the cities of Italy, there made its appearance that deadly pestilence, which, whether disseminated by the influence of the celestial bodies, or sent upon us mortals by God in His just wrath by way of retribution for our iniquities, had had its origin some years before in the East, whence, after destroying an innumerable multitude of living beings, it had propagated itself without respite from place to place, and so calamitously, had spread into the West.
In Florence, despite all that human wisdom and forethought could devise to avert it, as the cleansing of the city from many impurities by officials appointed for the purpose, the refusal of entrance to all sick folk, and the adoption of many precautions for the preservation of health; despite also humble supplications addressed to God, and often repeated both in public procession and otherwise by the devout; towards the beginning of the spring of the said year the doleful effects of the pestilence began to be horribly apparent by symptoms that shewed as if miraculous.
Not such were they as in the East, where an issue of blood from the nose was a manifest sign of inevitable death; but in men a women alike it first betrayed itself by the emergence of certain tumors in the groin or the armpits, some of which grew as large as a common apple, others as an egg, some more, some less, which the common folk called gavoccioli. From the two said parts of the body this deadly gavocciolo soon began to propagate and spread itself in all directions indifferently; after which the form of the malady began to change, black spots or livid making their appearance in many cases on the arm or the thigh or elsewhere, now few and large, then minute and numerous. And as the gavocciolo had been and still were an infallible token of approaching death, such also were these spots on whomsoever they shewed themselves. Which maladies seemed set entirely at naught both the art of the physician and the virtue of physic; indeed, whether it was that the disorder was of a nature to defy such treatment, or that the physicians were at fault - besides the qualified there was now a multitude both of men and of women who practiced without having received the slightest tincture of medical science - and, being in ignorance of its source, failed to apply the proper remedies; in either case, not merely were those that covered few, but almost all within three days from the appearance of the said symptoms, sooner or later, died, and in most cases without any fever or other attendant malady.
Moreover, the virulence of the pest was the greater by reason the intercourse was apt to convey it from the sick to the whole, just as fire devours things dry or greasy when they are brought close to it, the evil went yet further, for not merely by speech or association with the sick was the malady communicated to the healthy with consequent peril of common death; but any that touched the clothes the sick or aught else that had been touched, or used by these seemed thereby to contract the disease.
So marvelous sounds that which I have now to relate, that, had not many, and I among them, observed it with their own eyes, I had hardly dared to credit it, much less to set it down in writing, though I had had it from the lips of a credible witness.
I say, then, that such was the energy of the contagion of the said pestilence, that it was not merely propagated from man to mail, but, what is much more startling, it was frequently observed, that things which had belonged to one sick or dead of the disease, if touched by some other living creature, not of the human species, were the occasion, not merely of sickening, but of an almost instantaneous death. Whereof my own eyes (as I said a little before) had cognisance, one day among others, by the following experience. The rags of a poor man who had died of the disease being strewn about the open street, two hogs came thither, and after, as is their wont, no little trifling with their snouts, took the rags between their teeth and tossed them to and fro about their chaps; whereupon, almost immediately, they gave a few turns, and fell down dead, as if by poison, upon the rags which in an evil hour they had disturbed.
In which circumstances, not to speak of many others of a similar or even graver complexion, divers apprehensions and imaginations were engendered in the minds of such as were left alive, inclining almost all of them to the same harsh resolution, to wit, to shun and abhor all contact with the sick and all that belonged to them, thinking thereby to make each his own health secure. Among whom there were those who thought that to live temperately and avoid all excess would count for much as a preservative against seizures of this kind. Wherefore they banded together, and dissociating themselves from all others, formed communities in houses where there were no sick, and lived a separate and secluded life, which they regulated with the utmost care, avoiding every kind of luxury, but eating and drinking moderately of the most delicate viands and the finest wines, holding converse with none but one another, lest tidings of sickness or death should reach them, and diverting their minds with music and such other delights as they could devise. Others, the bias of whose minds was in the opposite direction, maintained, that to drink freely, frequent places of public resort, and take their pleasure with song and revel, sparing to satisfy no appetite, and to laugh and mock at no event, was the sovereign remedy for so great an evil: and that which they affirmed they also put in practice, so far as they were able, resorting day and night, now to this tavern, now to that, drinking with an entire disregard of rule or measure, and by preference making the houses of others, as it were, their inns, if they but saw in them aught that was particularly to their taste or liking; which they, were readily able to do, because the owners, seeing death imminent, had become as reckless of their property as of their lives; so that most of the houses were open to all comers, and no distinction was observed between the stranger who presented himself and the rightful lord. Thus, adhering ever to their inhuman determination to shun the sick, as far as possible, they ordered their life. In this extremity of our city's suffering and tribulation the venerable authority of laws, human and divine, was abased and all but totally dissolved for lack of those who should have administered and enforced them, most of whom, like the rest of the citizens, were either dead or sick or so hard bested for servants that they were unable to execute any office; whereby every man was free to do what was right in his own eyes.
Not a few there were who belonged to neither of the two said parties, but kept a middle course between them, neither laying t same restraint upon their diet as the former, nor allowing themselves the same license in drinking and other dissipations as the latter, but living with a degree of freedom sufficient to satisfy their appetite and not as recluses. They therefore walked abroad, carrying in the hands flowers or fragrant herbs or divers sorts of spices, which they frequently raised to their noses, deeming it an excellent thing thus to comfort the brain with such perfumes, because the air seemed be everywhere laden and reeking with the stench emitted by the dead and the dying, and the odours of drugs.
Some again, the most sound, perhaps, in judgment, as they were also the most harsh in temper, of all, affirmed that there was no medicine for the disease superior or equal in efficacv to flight; following which prescription a multitude of men and women, negligent of all but themselves, deserted their city, their houses, their estates, their kinsfolk, their goods, and went into voluntary exile, or migrated to the country parts, as if God in visiting men with this pestilence in requital of their iniquities would not pursue them with His wrath wherever they might be, but intended the destruction of such alone as remained within the circuit of the walls of the city; or deeming perchance, that it was now time for all to flee from it, and that its last hour was come.
Of the adherents of these divers opinions not all died, neither did all escape; but rather there were, of each sort and in every place many that sickened, and by those who retained their health were treated after the example which they themselves, while whole, had set, being everywhere left to languish in almost total neglect. Tedious were it to recount, how citizen avoided citizen, how among neighbors was scarce found any that shewed fellow-feeling for another, how kinsfolk held aloof, and never met, or but rarely; enough that this sore affliction entered so deep into the minds of men a women, that in the horror thereof brother was forsaken by brother nephew by uncle, brother by sister, and oftentimes husband by wife: nay, what is more, and scarcely to be believed, fathers and mothers were found to abandon their own children, untended, unvisited, to their fate, as if they had been strangers. Wherefore the sick of both sexes, whose number could not be estimated, were left without resource but in the charity of friends (and few such there were), or the interest of servants, who were hardly to be had at high rates and on unseemly terms, and being, moreover, one and all, men and women of gross understanding, and for the most part unused to such offices, concerned themselves no further than to supply the immediate and expressed wants of the sick, and to watch them die; in which service they themselves not seldom perished with their gains. In consequence of which dearth of servants and dereliction of the sick by neighbors, kinsfolk and friends, it came to pass-a thing, perhaps, never before heard of-that no woman, however dainty, fair or well-born she might be, shrank, when stricken with the disease, from the ministrations of a man, no matter whether he were young or no, or scrupled to expose to him every part of her body, with no more shame than if he had been a woman, submitting of necessity to that which her malady required; wherefrom, perchance, there resulted in after time some loss of modesty in such as recovered. Besides which many succumbed, who with proper attendance, would, perhaps, have escaped death; so that, what with the virulence of the plague and the lack of due attendance of the sick, the multitude of the deaths, that daily and nightly took place in the city, was such that those who heard the tale-not to say witnessed the fact-were struck dumb with amazement. Whereby, practices contrary to the former habits of the citizens could hardly fail to grow up among the survivors.
It had been, as to-day it still is, the custom for the women that were neighbors and of kin to the deceased to gather in his house with the women that were most closely connected with him, to wail with them in common, while on the other hand his male kinsfolk and neighbors, with not a few of the other citizens, and a due proportion of the clergy according to his quality, assembled without, in front of the house, to receive the corpse; and so the dead man was borne on the shoulders of his peers, with funeral pomp of taper and dirge, to the church selected by him before his death. Which rites, as the pestilence waxed in fury, were either in whole or in great part disused, and gave way to others of a novel order. For not only did no crowd of women surround the bed of the dying, but many passed from this life unregarded, and few indeed were they to whom were accorded the lamentations and bitter tears of sorrowing relations; nay, for the most part, their place was taken by the laugh, the jest, the festal gathering; observances which the women, domestic piety in large measure set aside, had adopted with very great advantage to their health. Few also there were whose bodies were attended to the church by more than ten or twelve of their neighbors, and those not the honorable and respected citizens; but a sort of corpse-carriers drawn from the baser ranks, who called themselves becchini and performed such offices for hire, would shoulder the bier, and with hurried steps carry it, not to the church of the dead man's choice, but to that which was nearest at hand, with four or six priests in front and a candle or two, or, perhaps, none; nor did the priests distress themselves with too long and solemn an office, but with the aid of the becchini hastily consigned the corpse to the first tomb which they found untenanted. The condition of the lower, and, perhaps, in great measure of the middle ranks, of the people shewed even worse and more deplorable; for, deluded by hope or constrained by poverty, they stayed in their quarters, in their houses where they sickened by thousands a day, and, being without service or help of any kind, were, so to speak, irredeemably devoted to the death which overtook them. Many died daily or nightly in the public streets; of many others, who died at home, the departure was hardly observed by their neighbors, until the stench of their putrefying bodies carried the tidings; and what with their corpses and the corpses of others who died on every hand the whole place was a sepulchre.
It was the common practice of most of the neighbors, moved no less by fear of contamination by the putrefying bodies than by charity towards the deceased, to drag the corpses out of the houses with their own hands, aided, perhaps, by a porter, if a porter was to be had, and to lay them in front of the doors, where any one who made the round might have seen, especially in the morning, more of them than he could count; afterwards they would have biers brought up or in default, planks, whereon they laid them. Nor was it once twice only that one and the same bier carried two or three corpses at once; but quite a considerable number of such cases occurred, one bier sufficing for husband and wife, two or three brothers, father and son, and so forth. And times without number it happened, that as two priests, bearing the cross, were on their way to perform the last office for some one, three or four biers were brought up by the porters in rear of them, so that, whereas the priests supposed that they had but one corpse to bury, they discovered that there were six or eight, or sometimes more. Nor, for all their number, were their obsequies honored by either tears or lights or crowds of mourners rather, it was come to this, that a dead man was then of no more account than a dead goat would be to-day.
The events of the Black Death, though tragic, had the ability bring life into perspective. The shortness, the unexpected, and the decisions of life. Many people died each day, and, since the disease was contagious even in death, hurried obsequies were performed, if at all. There was no knowing if you would contract this disease or not as you went about your day, even though there was a high chance of this. Clothing, bedding, objects, and animals could carry the disease, which makes it sound near impossible not to catch it. (though of course many didn’t) With this, came decisions. I wonder…had I lived during the Black Death, under which one of the four groups of desperate people that Boccaccio mentioned would I have fallen. The first group he described were (what I call them) “impious monks”. These folks would gather a select few who did not have the disease, and go off in a secluded community, kind of like the Amish today. (who don’t get chicken pox or need vaccines) The second group is the partyers, yolo. The third group is the “in-betweens”. They stayed in their towns, but took precautions nonetheless. Still others migrated. Reading about this stressful time, I think of how divided the people may have been, because of the four parties. Each one may have thought the other one wrong. (like the Avaricious and the Prodigal groups in the Inferno) Surrounded by so much death, people of all ages could not help but ponder life and its complications. “Look carefully then how you walk, not as unwise but as wise, making the best use of the time, because the days are evil.” (Ephesians 5:15-16 ESV)
ReplyDeleteThe Black Death brought out the worst in a lot of people. Most everyone thought only about themselves and trying not to get sick whereas in the past neighbors and friends helped each other through illness. Even within families the fear was great enough to tear relationships apart. "fathers and mothers were found to abandon their own children, untended, unvisited, to their fate, as if they had been strangers." The fact that parents would leave their sick children to die by themselves is disgusting. There are some challenges in life that bring people together, but this was not one of them.
ReplyDeleteThe Black Death had a drastic affect on the whole of Europe. Many people died during that time and the only thing that people thought about was how to protect themselves from the plague and they didn't worry about those who were sick. "Tedious were it to recount, how citizen avoided citizen, how among neighbors was scarce found any that shewed fellow-feeling for another, how kinsfolk held aloof, and never met,..." The way that Boccaccio described the conditions people lived in whether they were sick or not was utterly foul. People would leave their sick children by themselves, corpses were piled up in the streets, and houses were filled with filth and dirt and were often contaminated. The Black Death was a hard time in Europe and you were lucky if you survived.
ReplyDeleteGiovanni Boccaccio's account of the Black Death, I found interesting and devastating on how the diseases spread so quickly. This disease named Black Death, was so contagious and the results of getting this sickness were many and the chance of surviving were very little,"...in the illustrious city of Florence, the fairest of all the cities of Italy, there made its appearance that deadly pestilence..." Pretty much anything touching or relating to the person who had the disease and died whoever would come in contact with those things would quickly retract the sickness.There were not many if at all any doctors or cures for the people who fell ill. Many people that were not ill packed up and left as fast as they could in fear of contracting the illness. The sick and dead had very few to care for them and were left fending for themselves for families, neighbors, and the city broke up in two leaving the dying to care for themselves. Most fled out of the city from the disease, some (very few) stayed and helped care and tend to the sick, and others secluded themselves and tried to forget what was happening and kept on living. This disease spread rapidly breaking the city apart and the population dropped increasingly with all the people who were dying from the sickness.
ReplyDeleteWhat really struck me while looking over this reading is how common death became to the people at the time when the plauge struck. Many of us today have probally experienced the death of a loved one, maybe more then one. Anyone who has knows that it is not something that just happens and is forgotten. There is ussualy the visitation, the funeral, and the burrying, all of which is ussually followed by a period of sadness or mourning. Many people don't, or find it hard to go back back to their normal lives after this. During the black death however death was so frequent amoung peoples family, friends and neighbors that it soon just became a part of their lives, not an interuption of them. "Nor, for all their number, were their obsequies honored by either tears or lights or crowds of mourners rather, it was come to this, that a dead man was then of no more account than a dead goat would be to-day." I find this thought hard to grasp and cannot even begin to imagine how one could come to look at death in this manner. The passage also mentioned that people may not even notice if their neighbor had died, until the body started to smell, because many people tried to keep to themsleves. This was definently a dark and terrible time.
ReplyDeleteAlmost every family during 1313-1375 was affected by the Black Death. Yet, every person dealt with it in their own way. Boccaccio writes, “…Divers apprehensions and imaginations were engendered in the minds of such as were left alive, inclining almost all of them to the same harsh resolution, to wit, to shun and abhor all contact with the sick and all that belonged to them, thinking thereby to make each his own health secure.” Some people thought the best way to live was avoid excess and live simply. They formed communities and secluded themselves from the sick. Luxury was banned and eating and drinking delicately and moderately was upheld.They only talked to each other and occupied themselves with music and other activities. On the opposite end were those who thought living each day with happiness was the remedy for this sickness.They drank and ate freely, sang, celebrated, and hung out in public places. There were also those who were not as extreme, but were in the middle; they did not live life with hiding away in seclusion or completely abandoning. Some carried flowers, fragrant herbs, or spices to their noises to stop the smell of disease, dead, and dying. On the other hand some thought that God’s punishment of their sins would only be within the walls of the city and that one most flee to the countryside. So they neglected all and deserted their city, houses, family, and worldly goods and fled to the country. Many abandoned their family and friends who had Black Death and left them to die. Owners of stores and inns fled their property and buildings were were open to anyone. Laws were ignored and forgotten because those who usually administered them were either sick or dead. These represent just some ways people dealt with the tragedy all around them during the Black Plague.
ReplyDeleteThe black death affected such a vast amount of people in Europe; thousands upon thousands of people's lives were ended by this plague during 1313-1375. Death changed from being a horrible uncommon thing to everybody, to a commonly seen thing that wasn't necessarily as brutally horrible anymore. During the beginning years of the plague, people were completely petrified when someone they knew was killed by the plague. Toward the middle of the plague, it became so common to people that they weren't so shocked by death once it finally came to them. It was almost as if people knew it was coming and they were just waiting around to see who could last the longest before the plague reached them. This is totally different than being completely petrified by the first sight of death toward the beginning of the plague. Overall, I think this change in how people viewed the plague and the deaths that happened around them was very interesting in this week's readings.
ReplyDeleteThis pandemic, know as the black death has haunted the world for centuries due to its mysterious, sneaky, and above all deadly tactics as a disease. The thing that struck me was the absentmindedness of all who were exposed to this disease, for example the reading states: "It was the common practice of most of the neighbors, moved no less by fear of contamination by the putrefying bodies than by charity towards the deceased, to drag the corpses out of the houses with their own hands, aided, perhaps, by a porter..." It seems like the people back then had little to no knowledge of the way the black death spread, by human contact. It shocks me to know that people actually went out to disposed of infected dead bodies with their own hands, in term infecting themselves in the process! A massive amount of the population that was wiped out by this disease could have been cut in-half, if people understood the basics of how this sickness spread. Some people however were smart enough to hide in their houses, away from the disease lurking about in the streets on the corpses, animals, and even basic items that were touched by the infected. Basic knowledge of how diseases spread back then could have resulted in thousands of saved lives. The lack of knowledge in this area back then was one of the key components to the disease's overall "success".
ReplyDeleteThe black death affected thousands of families and became common among society. Hundreds of people died every day and was contagious in both life and death. One of the biggest problems was that the disease could be carried and contracted by anyone or anything. Just a couple things that could carry the bug was any type of animal or cloth material. “In Florence, despite all that human wisdom and forethought could devise to avert it, as the cleansing of the city from many impurities by officials appointed for the purpose, the refusal of entrance to all sick folk, and the adoption of many precautions for the preservation of health; despite also humble supplications addressed to God, and often repeated both in public procession and otherwise by the devout; towards the beginning of the spring of the said year the doleful effects of the pestilence began to be horribly apparent by symptoms that shewed as if miraculous.” So as this quote states, the sick were turned away and treated very poorly. The Black Death in Europe was a terrible time of mistreatment before death.
ReplyDeleteWhile reading Giovanni’s account of the Black Death I realized how terrifyingly similar the Black Death is to Ebola. Just as Ebola grabbed the attention of the world in 2014 and took hundreds of thousands of lives, in the same way the Black Death grasped the attention of much of the Europe as it expanded and grew throughout many major cities and countries. One can see, as Giovanni mentioned, that even the most experienced and learned physicians could not find a cure for the fast growing disease. Likewise, when Ebola struck Africa in 2014, it took months for even the most affluent and innovative medical researchers in the world to find a way to decrease the death rate while protecting the healthy. Similarly, both diseases were rapidly growing spreading from man to animal while killing off thousands and sometimes whole villages in a matter of a few short weeks. One way those who were caught up in the Black Death attempted to prevent death for themselves was the separation of the sick from the healthy. The heathy would carry this act out by creating groups of healthy men and women who would stay in houses where only healthy foods and fine wines were eaten and drunk, and any notion or thought of the Black Death was debauched by wonderful music or other forms of entertainment. This method of separating the sick from the healthy gave protection and somewhat of a peace of mind to those who were avoiding the rapidly growing disease. This method was also used during the Ebola crisis this past year. Many African tribes trying to battle Ebola would, instead of secluding the healthy from the sick, seclude the sick from the healthy by confining them into small villages were no one was allowed to enter or exit. This helped confine the disease but condemned anyone inside or who was showing symptoms of Ebola to a fairly short and painful death. It amazes me that history does in fact repeat itself, and this is clearly seen through the similarities of the Black Death and Ebola.
ReplyDeleteWhat I found interesting was the lack of care there was. Some of the people would just stop seeing their family."...that in the horror thereof brother was forsaken by brother nephew by uncle, brother by sister, and oftentimes husband by wife: nay, what is more, and scarcely to be believed, fathers and mothers were found to abandon their own children, untended, unvisited, to their fate, as if they had been strangers." They would abandon the people that they "loved" so they could live. It must have been scary to see so many people dying so quickly, but you would think you would try to care for your children or spouse. It just goes to show humanity's selfishness. But when someone would die, the people would gather then to mourn the dead's death. "It had been, as to-day it still is, the custom for the women that were neighbors and of kin to the deceased to gather in his house with the women that were most closely connected with him, to wail with them in common..." That's kind of sad. Only after the person is dead, do their close one's care. Also, though, sometimes the dead would be left unregarded. People wouldn't even care that they were dead. "it was come to this, that a dead man was then of no more account than a dead goat would be to-day."
ReplyDeleteWhat stood out to me this week in Decameron is summed up most easily in this quote: “…that in the horror thereof brother was forsaken by brother … brother by sister, and oftentimes husband by wife: nay, what is more, and scarcely to be believed, fathers and mothers were found to abandon their own children, untended, unvisited, to their fate, as if they had been strangers.” Even given the horrendous circumstances, it is incredible to me how parents could abandon their children for fear of their own lives. The idea of sacrificial love seems to have been largely lost in this era. Of course, everyone expressed their selfish concerns in different ways, but the collective thought was that of self-preservation. Some retreated into houses, living frugally and distancing themselves from those ravaged by disease. Others lived with extravagance, their purpose being to fill their lives with as much happiness as possible in order to forget their trouble circumstances, and in consequence, the lives of those around them. A balanced center was found between these two extremes, yet even those who lived with relative normalcy had selfish purposes. Notwithstanding, I’m sure there were some living who gave their best efforts to the mitigation of pain. However, the driving force from 1313 to 1375 was intense desire for self-preservation rather than selfless service to the needs of others.
ReplyDeleteWhat hit me hardest about this blog post was this line, “Many died daily or nightly in the public streets; of many others, who died at home, the departure was hardly observed by their neighbors, until the stench of their putrefying bodies carried the tidings.”So many deaths went unnoticed because so many were dying. Those who were secluded knew nothing about their friends’ well being, unless they were together in a secluded house. From what I understand of this quote, a person in one of these houses received most of their new about the outside world through their nose; depending on how bad the stench was told how many dead bodies lay rotting outside their dwelling.
ReplyDeleteReading this reminded me of the fragility of life – how could just a tiny little bacteria kill so many thousands of people? You never know when or how you will die, so we have to live each and every day as if it is our last. We also can’t take even the little things for granted, such as having our loved ones with us or being able to breathe fresh air and not have to carry around flowers or herbs to cover up the smell of rotting flesh - “because the air seemed be everywhere laden and reeking with the stench emitted by the dead and the dying, and the odours of drugs.” The people that didn’t have the disease stayed as far away from anyone, including the corpses, who had contracted the Black Death. People got so used to seeing death that “a dead man was then of no more account than a dead goat would be to-day.” The dead bodies were not properly buried or mourned simply because there were not enough living people to bury them all!
ReplyDeleteA disease of this magnitude is bound to create an atmosphere of fear. Yet, despite the horrors of the plague, the way that people treated the sick is equally disturbing to me. He writes, “Tedious were it to recount, how citizen avoided citizen, how among neighbors was scarce found any that shewed fellow-feeling for another, how kinsfolk held aloof, and never met, or but rarely; enough that this sore affliction entered so deep into the minds of men a women, that in the horror thereof brother was forsaken by brother nephew by uncle, brother by sister, and oftentimes husband by wife: nay, what is more, and scarcely to be believed, fathers and mothers were found to abandon their own children, untended, unvisited, to their fate, as if they had been strangers.” The plague created a lose lose situation. If someone chose to care for the sick, they were somewhat carelessly exposing themselves to sickness, but avoiding the disease did not guarantee health either. Motivated by self-preservation, family and friends were torn apart by fear of sickness. Many left their loved ones alone “to their fate.” The Black Death was disease of the body; fear was the black death of the human heart.
ReplyDeleteWhile reading Boccaccio’s account of the Black Death, it made me think that these people probably felt like they were living through the apocalypse! To me, it sounded like the end of the world.
ReplyDelete“In this extremity of our city's suffering and tribulation the venerable authority of laws, human and divine, was abased and all but totally dissolved for lack of those who should have administered and enforced them, most of whom, like the rest of the citizens, were either dead or sick or so hard bested for servants that they were unable to execute any office; whereby every man was free to do what was right in his own eyes.”
This quote well summarizes the consequences of such an extensive epidemic. Laws were not enforced, family and friends abandoned each other, and the air literally stank of rotting flesh. Can you imagine living through this? I know I can’t. It is no wonder that after a time like this the world that emerged was incredibly different.